As I set off for a Carol Service at Swarby this afternoon, the snow was coming down in huge wedges, almost blotting out the road and sky. The little country lanes were treacherous, but eventually I made it to this delightful little ancient church and was warmed to see it full of young and old alike. We sang carols merrily, heard those evocative stories of the first Christmas and ‘oohed and aahed’ just a little bit as the youngsters played guitars, read funny verses and cheered after every carol (a small baby girl at the back!). This is what Christmas is about, I thought.

I then got in the car to make the journey to a, by now dark, dank and extremely cold, Lincoln. To the church of St Mary le Wigford to be exact, where Lincoln U2charist is housed. Each sunday night, the church hall plays host to about eighty or so homeless people and Liz Jackson, the animator of the project, organised a full Christmas meal tonight. There were some twenty volunteer helpers, all dressed up in tinsel and Santa Claus hats, to greet the men and women who came in for, perhaps, the first warmth of the day. They are a very mixed bunch of people: some smartly dressed, others bedraggled and wet and in clothes that have seen many Christmasses. There are very young and very old, and the air in the hall seemed to go tangibly colder and damper as they moseyed in. The evening began with an air of diffidence and a quietness and reserve brought on by having to brave the unpleasant conditions. As the tea and coffee warmed our clients, and the soup, turkey, trifle and mince pies invigorated their hearts, there began to be chatter and some laughter in the air. It doesn’t take much to resurrect people. The men and women were entertained royally by John Allison (who sang the UK’s most succesful ever Eurovision entry in 1961-check him out on YouTube-

 www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVY4vSvQbnO&feature=related ), who pops in most weeks, and then the Salvation Army Band struck up the familiar chords of Christmas. This was a raggle-taggle cross-section of humanity, but to a man and woman grateful for the experience whether server or served.

There are increasing numbers of people sleeping rough in Lincoln: there is a Polish tent village by the river, others sleep in doorways or shed or garage, others ’sofa surf’. A young man and woman I talked to had been evicted and were sleeping on an old mattress under Pelham Bridge; ‘the rains alright, said the man, but the snow blows under the bridge-we’re forever wet and cold’. Official counts put the numbers of people sleeping rough as very low: those who work with them set the numbers very much higher. If you are homeless, you cannot receive mail, save money or keep possessions safe. The low self -esteem brought on my homelessness can lead to self harm, drug and drink abuse, depression and crime. If you have no home to look forward to, you cannot get yourself out of the downward spiral: this, quite pleasant and ordinary looking couple, were in just such a spiral and can see no way out. There are many reasons why people become homeless, but those who know tell us that mental illness, substance abuse and relationship breakdown are the main causes.

I write about this now to highlight the fact that the problem of homelessness is not getting better, far from it-it is getting worse, and the victims are largely unseen, unrecognised and unloved by the rest of society. There is something that can be done immediately and effectively: BeAttitude (the offshoot of U2charist Lincoln that works with the homeless-follow the U2charist link to the right) could do with any clothes that will help the men and women keep warm: offers of financial support will help us feed them regularly and well, and a thought for the homelessness when you come to vote this next year might help as well.

My afternoon showed me that there are quite definitely two sides to Christmas, and two sides to our society. There will be a service in Lincoln Cathedral on 31st January at 6pm, when all the churches of Lincoln come together to focus on the plight of the homeless. Come along!

The Ugandan government is considering passing a new law which will criminalize homosexual behaviour and punish it with very severe penalties. Anyone who is aware of someone who is gay will be given 24 hours to ’shop’ that person, or they themselves will be prosecuted. Attempts at homosexual encounter will be punishable with life imprisonment. Those who engage in repeated active homosexual behaviour will be executed.

Now I don’t think it matters which side of the great divide you stand on this one, whether you approve of homosexuality or not, whether you think it is an innate state of being or not, whether you think it is condemned in the Bible or not, whether you support gay clergy and bishops or not. Whatever your standpoint, surely this one is a ‘no-brainer’ and is tantamount to legalizing the kind of fascist behaviour that characterised the concentration camps of Second World War Germany.

It doesn’t take an Archbishop to tell us this is wrong, or to speak out on our behalf. It just takes a halfway decent person with an ounce of right-thinking. It is with deep regret that we learn that one bishop, Joseph Abura of Karamoja, actually supports the proposed law: goodness only knows what Bible he is reading or what Jesus he is a disciple of!

I am sure that your representations about this Bill will be heard through Amnesty International. Join now! www.amnesty.org.uk

In the summer of 1985, I was invited, along with other Further Education College chaplains, to go to Berlin and investigate their comprehensive and very effective chaplaincy set up. I was billeted, with a violinist from the Berlin Philarmonie, in a grand old second floor apartment of a large ‘Victorian’ (or whatever the German equivalent is!) town house, replete with creaky wire mesh encased lift and flamboyant plaster mouldings on the ceilings. It was in the days before the Berlin Wall came down, and our initial forays were to see the Ka De We (a department store, so dripping with opulence and all the goods the western world could offer that it faintly stirred one’s conscience, and called in full the ‘kaufhaus des Westens’) and thereafter some of the better known ’sites’ of the Second World War, including a pig slaughterhouse in which thousands of dissident Poles were massacred in one night; the Jewish synagogue which was at the centre of ‘Krystalnacht’, the destructive attack which heralded the beginning of the persecution of the Jews and the Spandau Castle in which the sad figure of Rudolf Hess was imprisoned until his death.

After three days of experiencing the extravagant riches of the West, we travelled by U-Bahn (underground railway) into East Berlin to meet with some young Lutheran Christians. We were conscious straight away of the difference that the Berlin Wall symbolised: here, in the East, the buildings were un-reconstructed from the war period and shell holes still pocked the walls. There were few goods, if any, in the shops and miserly cuts of meat hung desolately in the butchers’ windows. We stopped for a cappuccino coffee, Communist style, in the main square to find that it tasted suspiciously of acorns. We were met by the young Christians, all dressed in very modern western gear, who quietly ordered us to split into three separate groups and rendezvous in the basement of a youth club. We were, you see, being followed and the young people were regarded as dissidents and malcontents: revolutionaries wishing to bring down Communism. To meet with us was dangerous, and we had to lose the ‘tails’ the authorities had put on to us. Eventually, we re-assembled feeling like John le Carre agents, and learnt of the group’s desire to bring about a just, equal and free State, and their vehicle to achieve this was the Christian Church, for so long proscribed and hidden, but now beginning, once more, to flex its muscles which had grown weak, but had not stopped exercising its psychological grip over the German people living under Communism (so steeped in the traditions of the Church were they that the Communist regime had to invent a ceremony of initiation into the Communist party at age 11 to mimic Confirmation). After hearing their story, we were rushed through the darkened and deserted streets of the city, with the eerie sound of distant sirens and the clanking of a Stasi style cavalcade of black limousines taking an unknown Politburo official to who knows where, and took the final pre-Second World War tram and subsequent U-Bahn to the unbelievably bright lights of the West. We heard stories of whole families who had been separated by the building of the Wall and of how the Communist regime had bled the East of the city dry, taking such riches as it had to Russia. Yet still, the only real light in those dismal, oppressive streets, was the light of Faith in the youngsters eyes.

Some years later, a German friend ‘phoned me excitedly at the end of the night of 9th November 1990 to tell me that the Wall was being demolished and that Germany was, at last, re-united. I entered into his excitement, although it meant little practically to me, as I contemplated that the World was probably just a little better as brick was parted from brick and stone from stone.

Life is full of walls: some we build around ourselves to protect ourselves from emotional hurt and harm, or to encircle some fondly held belief or position (religious people are very good at building walls, but we call them ‘principles’). We also build real walls: walls which protect the rich from the poor and actually create a fearful living hell for both. But perhaps the most obscene wall of all is the one built along the West Bank in Israel, separating Israeli from Palestinian: a modern-day attempt to solve our problems by cutting ourselves off from those with whom we disagree. This wall too will fall one day and, until it does, the World will remain a blighted place. There is hope! That warrior in art: Banksy, has shown us what may be. Along the length of the wall he has depicted idyllic English rural scenes, or pictures of cosy domesticity: as if we look through the unyielding starkness of the wall to the way the world could be.

                                            Come the young and save us!

Well those nasty Roman Catholics have been at it again I see. Sneakily offering to take on board, re-train and re-ordain, some of our nice Anglican clergy. They’re going to jump ship in their thousands, the Church of England will be brought to its knees, all our churches will return to Catholic safe hands and Christendom as we know it will cease to exist. We’ll all be genuflecting in the streets and it will all become like those awful foreign countries with their tacky plastic madonnas and disgusting relics-nice to visit, but you wouldn’t want to live there.

Hold on, wait a minute, no it’s not the awful ‘Latin Mission’ at all: its the fuddy duddy, trendy wendy, beardy wierdy, trying too hard, wishy washy, Church of England that’s to blame. Yes, its them: wilfully ordaining women as priests, knowing that some people just won’t like it and then compounding the problem by marching gamely towards women bishops and all the while diluting the strong meat of the Gospel, appointing athiest bishops, allowing men with silly haircuts to become vicars, colluding with the secular State that wants to get rid of Christmas, capitulating to the Muslims and just- well just not being like I want it to be.

Just a minute, its not the Catholics or the Anglicans at all, its the athiests: crudely arguing, religion hating alternative bigots who are just being really nasty to us lovely Christians and, well, haven’t got the point. They’re the ones to blame. I know what I’d do, I’d hang them and flog them and then kill them! Oh, no, that’s been tried before. No, I’d argue reasonably with them whilst smugly claiming that my truth is indeed better  theirs and we’re right really, and always have been.

If I might make a plea for authentic Anglicanism over and above the caterwauling of the media and the anguished cries of those who don’t really  care anyway, I would suggest that we are all adults here and that we enjoy an unprecedented and cherished religious freedom and toleration. The (highly intelligent, faithful and concerned)  leaders of the Church of England, including its bishops, are confronting real and hard issues: the justice of equal rights for women , for understanding and acceptance of those whose sexuality is different from that of the majority, the problem of faithfully and creatively demonstrating a robust, credible and meaningful Gospel to a world awash with self-interest and greed and with the human outcasts these priorities create. Meanwhile, the Catholic Church also struggles with these concerns as well, but chooses the route of strong, centralised authority to address them.

And this is the real issue that faces us: that of authority. There are those in life who like things clear cut, determined and under-girded by an over-arching authoritative figure or body. For those who like their understanding of the meaning of life-their faith-enshrined in this way the Catholic Church is the natural home at this moment in history, and the Papal hand is held out to them. There are those others who feel that the whole of life is just that little bit too complex for strong answers and for clear cut directives: those who struggle to find an intelligent and sensible but real way through the difficult intellectual and spiritual mazes of life, content that most people share that sense of complexity and spiritual mystery and are happy to have companions of faith on the pilgrimage through life. The Anglican Church at the moment is the natural home of these people, but will be a difficult berth for those who crave order and security. 

Along the way, there will be some switching of berths, some re-adjustments of the tiller and lots of revision and re-revision in our thinking and our attitudes as we react to the ever-changing circumstances of life. Pope Benedict has merely offered an opening to those who already find Anglicanism difficult anyway, and a compassionate way forward. Meanwhile, the hard slog and joyful encounter of the Church of England’s work in the parishes: amongst the tired, the lonely, the new-born, the soon-to-be-weds, the bereaved, the nurseries, the old people’s homes, the schools, the universities, hospitals and the ordinary homes and lives of ordinary people and much, much more will continue. It will be different and possibly diminished if some of the catholic voices and experience leave for warmer climes, but it will not cease to be and it will continue to explore the mystery which is life through the lens of Jesus Christ.

That’s why I am, and will continue to be, an Anglican.

In the parlance of my native Sheffield: ‘I can’t get my breath!’ For the past twenty or so years, the Church, amongst other major institutions, has been working overtime to introduce measures into our corporate life that will safeguard young children and vulnerable adults. We have been largely successful in this, and, I think, can be justifiably gratified that most church communities now have a Policy for child protection and the national Church itself has highly developed methods for filtering out potential priests and employees who might misuse their position. Mindful of the immense amount of distress and suffering the Irish Roman Catholic Church has uncovered in relation to this issue, our present day arrangements to safeguard victims are not before time and are to be deeply welcomed.

Imagine then my distaste to find that there are those who believe that Roman Polanski, the famous film producer who perpetrated a pre-meditated sexual attack of the most dreadful kind on a thirteen year old girl in the late 1970s, should be saved from any prosecution. Their arguments range from: ‘it was over thirty years ago’ and ‘he’s a man of great artistic ability and genius: prosecution would be demeaning for him’ to ‘he’s suffered enough in his life’ (his pregnant wife, the actress Sharon Tate, was cruelly murdered by Charles Manson).

The arguments demand an answer. It is true that ‘genius’ and bizarre and cruel behaviour often go together: one has in one’s mind the picture of Van Gogh with his ear sliced away or the ’discipline’  Thomas More is now said to have inflicted on his family, but are we really saying that the protection of the weak and vulnerable, and the moral code that goes with it, should be compromised because someone has made a major contribution to our cultural life?

Equally, is it right to punish someone so long after the crime they have committed? Those Nazis who sentenced others to death and suffering have been pursued until their own deaths because society needs to send the signal to itself that such heinous crimes and behaviour are anathema and beyond toleration. For Polanski’s victim, despite her open-hearted assertion that she has forgiven her attacker, and for others in her position the mental and physical scars of such abuse in incalculable. If the knowledge that they will be constantly sought and pursued prevents a potential abuser committing a crime, then such pursuit is doing its job.

It is true that Polanski has suffered many terrible events in his life: but does weighing this against his own crime add anything to our own efforts to eradicate and eliminate such terrible happenings? From all I have read, his attack on Samantha Galley was lascivious, self-seeking, heedless of her feelings or well-being, abusive in every sense and committed after he had deliberately fed her with drugs and drink to render her senseless. The pain he has himself endured he has deliberately and purposefully inflicted on a young child. What is perhaps most distressing, and in common with many other paedophiles, is that Polanski has never once suggested he is remorseful or craves forgiveness and instead projects guilt and culpability for the incident on his victim (Polanski was 44 when these events occurred).

We are aware that artists and others bound up in the world of culture and media often live their lives in a moral and ethical bubble of their own making (the lifestyles of many great Rock musicians do not bear too close examination) and are often derived from their unique viewpoint on the world. This can be the fount of their genius. However, if we allow even a chink of leniency to dismantle our laws surrounding this issue, then we are  surely serving to put our young and vulnerable at risk?

At a recent meeting of the Bishops, the Archbishop of Canterbury broke off from his comments on worldwide Anglican affairs to say that, although it was completely off the subject, we should all try and get to see ‘The Mysteries’ at the Garrick Theatre. Not amongst those who would pass up any suggestion from Rowan, and finding ourselves in London at the Royal Foundation of St Katherine for our annual residential Lincoln Senior Staff meeting, off we went to witness this remarkable production.

‘The Mysteries’ are, in fact, medieval mystery plays, such as are performed all over England to this day. These particular ones originated in Chester, and bear all the hallmarks of that robust and irreverent attitude to the Bible and religion that produced the Canterbury Tales. However, here the similarities to our own homegrown efforts ends: for these Mysteries are performed by black South Africans who have their origins in the most desperately poor and deprived areas of that country. performed in English, Afrikaans and tribal dialects simultaneously, the stories of Creation, Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac, Noah and the flood, the Nativity, the ministry, crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus are all told from the standpoint of the pitilessly poor people of Africa. God is played by a woman: and her ‘glory’ is indicated by her colourful tribal costume. However, soon God is incarnated into Jesus by the simple device of taking off the impressive costume to reveal underneath the rags of a Sowetan peasant. I can think of no more powerful treatise on God’s self-emptying as this.

The show is riven with music, dance and fine oratory: but all the instruments are ones that  found in the township rubbish dumps: oil barrels become drums, corrugated tubing becomes percussion, plastic tubes become trumpets. Satan, portrayed by a young woman, becomes the snake of Eden and the cock which crowed for Peter by the simple expedient of movement.The dance is thoroughly African: joyous and infectious, and the prose is spoken with the hypnotic clicks and ‘tuts’ of tribal dialects. All of these components build up into a mesmerizing and moving rendition of the principles of the Christian Faith: most moving for me was the scene which portrayed the massacre of the innocents (a reality which many of the actors must have been close to if not actively have witnessed): four women clutching bundles of newspapers and straw became madonnas holding babies, and their murder became real in our minds and linked to the real life murders that are taking place all over Africa as we speak.

The whole of Jesus’s ministry was summoned up in one dance: Jesus, the woman, begins the gestures and shimmies of an African dance: slowly, hesitatingly and with many mistakes, the disciples join in and then, finally, get it right and the dance becomes an expression of their unity and purpose as they move in sequence. At the Resurrection, the disciples test themselves out and find that they can still dance!

There was much to take home from all of this, but primarily the deepest feeling that the wisdom of the Christian Faith is not so much to be found in fancy words, persuasive argument, glorious liturgy or academic theology, more in the way we intuitively experience its Truths in the very fabric of existence: in the dance of life.

Perhaps they should make ++Rowan a theatre critic?

I will soon be off on holiday and this year we have decided to embark upon a long cherished idea for an adventure: we’re off to France, the Somme to be precise, to have a nosy around the First World War sites. We had a brief glimpse as a family some years ago when we spent a night there on route to Spain. I remember with both delight and chagrin my two sons running around the still extant trenches at the Newfoundlanders’ memorial, pretending to shoot each other and die quite dramatically. I was delighted, because my sons were using their imagination to play around a theme that they  knew little about-only the memories of X Box ’shoot ‘em ups’. I felt chagrin, because I ruminated that neither of those two young boys would have been able to run around in such a way had not my own grandfather survived every major campaign of that ghastly war (he was in the Royal Engineers): sometime after his death and a good while before the birth of my sons, I took part in our school play when we enacted ‘Oh What A Lovely War’. The cutting and satirical insights of that play have stayed with me always, and I remain distrustful of believing that every war that we are enagaged in is a righteous one. I am proud of my father’s involvement, as one of the first Commandos, in bringing down the great evil of Nazi fascism. I have less reason to believe that other conflicts that we have been involved in had such a moral authority.

On Monday last I had the great honour and privilege, but also deeply disturbing and challenging duty, of giving the Absolution and Blessing at the funeral of Captain Daniel Shepherd in Lincoln Cathedral.(www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6723889.ece) . A man of 28 years old with a young wife, he was an undoubtedly very brave man, and he deserves our respect and admiration and also our deep regret and sadness at  his loss. He was part of the Explosive Ordance Disposal Regiment and had already defused some fifty makeshift bombs. He was killed whilst trying to defuse just such a bomb.

At his funeral, faced with the pomp and ceremony of the Cathedral and the Military, I had two very different thoughts going through my head: on the one hand, I thought it right that the death of someone so young who died in such a noble way should be marked by the highest and most lavish ceremony possible to express a Nation’s gratitude and regret and to speak of the hope of the Resurrection even in the deepest moments of hopelessness. Daniel’s wife, family and friends all had a right to the best the nation could give them as they laid their loved one to rest: the fallen in battle. On the other hand, my heart went out to Daniel’s close family who experienced the full glare of the media at the funeral and had to cosset their own private grief in the context of a packed and dramatic liturgy. I hope they get all the love and support they will need in months to come when the media spotlight dims and a nation’s mourning moves on to gather around new, fresh graves.

Four more men came home in coffins today, four more generations of young boys and girls who will now not be born. A nation and a grieving family all have the right to ask the question that we should all ask, and the nation should ask, before it embarks upon and then continues conflict: ‘Is it worth it?’ Sometimes, the answer will be ‘yes’ as, I believe, with the Second World War. At other times we will hear the answer which we should have heard before the First World War: ‘No!’ God give us the wisdom to know the difference.

In Monday’s ‘Independent’, a young soldier wrote from Afghanistan about his feelings and experiences. One passage is worth repeating here…

When you read about a ‘very seriously injured’ casualty that person’s life is never going to be the same, nor is it for the rest of their family, who will be sucked in and forever affected by the aftermath.

Sometimes it is as if we, who are not involved, are playing at war like my two sons in those Picardy trenches. The funeral of that young hero, Daniel Shepherd, reminded me that war is no game for the family and friends who are left behind and for the dead who sacrifice precious years-and that we should think hard and long before we play.

So ‘farewell then Henry Allingham’, one of five survivors of the First World War and, for one glorious month, the oldest man in the world. Putting his longevity down to ‘cigarettes, whisky and wild, wild women’ he also attributed his great age to ‘trying to be as good as you can’. He seems to have been a wonderful man who lived a wonderful life. Henry died in a strange week for the news: one in which the highly Calvinist Scottish Island of Lewis has been riven down the middle by news that the Caledonian McBrayne Ferry company are going to disturb the sabbath rest by laying on a Sunday ferry. The Kirk is up in arms and there is much quoting of biblical texts taking place. Interestingly, a similar fracas is taking place in France where President Sarkozy has indicated that he wishes to relax the country’s strict Sunday opening laws. Now, forgive me if I am wrong, but do I recall that the arguments around relaxing England’s Sunday trading laws were that unfettered seven day a week consumerism was already being enjoyed on the Continent and that it would be selfish of us not to join in? Yet another lie then to get us to give in to unbridled profiteering. Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not against Sunday trading for religious reasons but because it has had dreadful consequences for the family, has removed one day of the week when we could all think of ‘higher’ things and not have to work and has also enforced seven day working on the most vulnerable in society. Hey ho! It’s off to the Garden Centre we go.

This is also a week in which that most English of pursuits, Thought for the Day, has been questioned and there are serious doubts as to whether it will survive. As English as the Archers and Cricket on the village green, Thought for the Day has given a platform for faith commentators for decades: and I’m with those who would abolish its exclusively faith based nature. For one thing, the easy access of the Church and other faith communities to this unchallenged privilege of airtime has led to some of the most humdrum and platitudiness spouting on faith and religion I have ever heard. Equally, I am dismayed by those who claim such privileges for the Church because they are part of the fabric that continues to make our nation a Christian one. I am very uneasy when society or organisation claims the involvement of the Church because it stresses our ‘Britishness’ and the Church appears subservient to a strange form of patriotism. The Church should be free and unfettered to speak out as and when it likes, even if it is subversive of a prevailing social trait. Likewise, if Thought for the Day were opened up to men and women of all persuasions and understandings, then the Faith communities would have to fight there corner in the marketplace of public opinion. Wouldn’t this mean our contribution to public thought would have to be more robust and thought through than the sentimental drivel we

sometimes endure now?

Besides, if Thought for the Day were opened up to all, then we might hear the wisdom of men like Henry Allingham who said that ‘one of the secrets of old age is not to hang about with too many old people’. Perhaps best of all, we might have heard him say: ‘War’s stupid. Nobody wins. You might as well talk first, you have to talk last anyway’.

   Recently, I visited my daughter and grandson in their Cheshire home-not too far away from the residences of certain lavishly rich footballers, but on nothing like the same grandiose scale. When visiting them, I like to go to the local multi-store shopping complex: itself the size of small town, and then I go into the shop that sells Mark’s and Spencer’s clothing and gear. Half an hour later, pushing an excitable baby in a pushchair, we emerge with a good quality T shirt (£6); a pair of black slacks (for everyday wear-£9) and two packs of 10 black socks (‘priests have the blackest socks in the world’-Father Ted. £10). A very satisfactory shopping experience done with, I loiter outside the shop to await my wife and daughter, who have been pursuing an equally impecunious shopping experience in the M&S for women at the other side of the complex. ‘What’s this? I ask myself, looking at the shop to whose window I have my back. ‘A designer clothes shop’ I answer myself. And there were all the designer labels: Armani, Dolce and Gabbana, Lacoste-you name it, they had it, and there was a sale on too! So, for the second time that day, my grandson and I risk life, limb and wallet thickness in a clothes shop.I emerged, blinking, some two minutes later having realised that their idea of a ’sale’ was to sell the exact same T shirt that I brought across the road for £6 for £40!    The difference? A designer label. And this kind of price inflation was repeated for all the clothing-similar slacks to mine-£50! I seriously considered standing for a while and re-directing the poor unsuspecting fools to M&S, but my too often embarrassed (by me) wife and daughter prevented this from happening, and instead gently led my shocked self away explaining that that was what people did in Cheshire: it wasn’t the quality of the clothing that mattered, but that you could demonstrate by wearing ‘the label’ that you were a person of substance and had some money (to burn). Being a Yorkshireman, it took me quite a few days to recover and even now I have moments of withdrawal when I consider contacting the Ombudsman. It seemed to me to be the worse kind of ‘keeping up with the Joneses’ and a sad indictment of a consumer mad society. Whatever happened to ‘consider the lilies of the field, they neither sow nor spin and yet Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these’?

Recently, I read a charming little book entitled ‘The Return of the Economic Naturalist’ by Robert H Frank in which he questions, as an expert, some of our modern understandings of economics: the ‘trickle down theory’, the efficacy of lowering taxes etc. I leave you with a quote…

Social critics in the past have relied mainly on their own personal prejudices about how we might best spend our money. But a large body of scientific literature suggest our recent spending patterns have not served us well. Careful studies show, for example, that when everyone acquires bigger houses and more expensive automobiles, the new higher standards become the norm, with the result that these expenditures yield little satisfaction. Other evidence suggests, however, that the same resources could have been used in ways that bring permanent increases in health and happiness. The time required to earn the money to pay for larger houses, for instance, could be freed up for family and friends, exercise, or longer vacations. …we may call this ‘inconspicious consumption’. Those who spend more on inconspicious consumption are more likely to describe themselves as happy…less likely to seek psychological counselling…attempt suicide. And they are less likely to die or be ill in a any given year.

Where your treasure is there will your hearts be  also?

In 1994, one of my parishioners asked me whether I would consider accompanying himself and his friends to France on June 6th. His ‘friends’; turned out to be his old Second World War comrades: the ‘Hallams-Fontenay Club’. These old pals, formerly grocers, steelworkers, newsagents and such like, had found themselves drafted into the York and Lancaster Regiment close to the beginning of the end of the war, and became foot soldiers who entered the Normandy invasion in the first week. They saw and experienced many horrors: the massed bodies of some Canadian soldiers in a street corner who had been massacred by the Nazis being most notable. They soon found themselves in a small village north east of Caen called Fontenay le Pesnel; here they dug into their slit trenches and remained under enemy fire for weeks and months. My parishioner, Arthur, had the dread duty of driving a supply wagon to the soldiers at the Front. One of his pals had been killed on the road he used and each day he had to drive over his body; for war does not protect the living let alone the dead. After some months these ordinary lads beat back their unknown enemy (it was only later that they discovered they were a crack Panzer division) and the long slow march to Berlin began.

I was privileged to become their unofficial chaplain, and accompanied them many times on the visits to Normandy with its landing beaches of Sword, Juno, Omaha, Utah and Gold. The ‘mulberry harbours’, floated on barges to create a makeshift haven, are still there to this day as are the many graveyards which mark the last resting place of young boys who simply went to war in their naievity, enthusiasm and fear. They never counted themselves ‘heroes’, it is we who have made them so, and rightly. Many things stand out in my mind about those visits: the first in 1994, when the streets were filled with 1940s vehicles and young people dressed in the uniforms and day clothes of the time. Thereafter, taking another parishioner, whose brother had been killed in Normandy, and whose grave he had never seen. Standing at the side of the grave some 50 years after the soldier’s death with his weeping septuagenarian sibling-still feeling the pain  of loss. Happening, for the first time since the war, upon a cemetery where ‘Hallams’ were buried. Discovering their white grave markers and one of my companions saying: ‘I was with him when he was shot’ and, for me, time conflating as I looked at the inscription on the grave which said ‘18 years old’ as I stood beside his eighty year old comrade in arms. What could have been and what was not? To this day, when I find myself in Caen, I visit the Commonwealth cemetery there and go and say ‘hello’ to ‘Knocker’ Lees, a doughty old sergeant and boxer in civilian life, who befriended a small, frightened young soldier. ‘Knocker’ was killed in the first few hours on French soil and he died at his young friend’s side. That young friend was amongst our party in 1994 and made me promise that, should anything happen to him, I would visit his mentor and protector whenever I could.

However, two incidents stand out for me as very important: once, when returning home from France, we got into Portsmouth and, whilst we sat on the coach, witnessed an Asian port attendant being racially abused: one of our men shouted out ‘oi-no racism!’. Another time, I conducted a memorial service in a cemetery which contained both British and German dead. I chanced my arm, and nervously suggested that we pray for the enemy dead as well as our own, in the spirit of the Lord’s Prayer. As one man almost, they whispered:  ’of course, we must’. These were the real heroes of the Second World War and they adequately demonstrated the values for which they fought and would havedied and which the BNP and others tell us we must recover. The values and the Britain they fought and died for were those which accepted and honoured the stranger, the foreigner and the different into their midst rather than set them in concentration camps. The values they fought and died for were forgiveness and the desire for the peace and unity of humanity-exactly opposite to those values the BNP dress up as virtues. The election of BNP members to the EU is a blemish on the conscience of the British people and it is a slur and an insult to those men of the Hallams Fontenay Club. Perhaps now the real battle for the soul of the nation begins?