The Body Politic

It’s been an interesting few weeks. Having recently been interviewed by the media concerning the funeral of Baroness Thatcher, it has been instructive to gauge the reaction to my remarks. Some, of course, branded me the devil incarnate and suggested that I was being hateful and then, intriguingly, wrote to me or e-mailed me in a highly vitriolic and bile-filled way. Much of this correspondence was anonymous, and so one doesn’t really take much notice. Others called for my immediate resignation, or suggested that the Queen might be upset by what I said, or sought to remind me, as if I didn’t know, what the real political situation was in the 1980s. But, of course, this was a period I lived through as a priest on the streets of Manchester, Salford and Sheffield: areas deeply affected by the divisions of that period and which still bear the brunt of poverty, marginalisation and deprivation. It has to be said that I received far more support, both written and verbal, for the points I made, than opposition, and it is significant that the support centred around a concern for those areas which still experience both the fallout and the results of policies pursued 30 years ago. The problem is that we tend to live in sealed bubbles in this country, and it is hard for comfortable middle-England to understand, let alone experience, what the people of the deprived areas of our land undergo. Here we still have a serious social divide, and it is a divide which is as much a spiritual one as it is about material well-being: it’s simply too easy not to care and to dismiss the problems of the poor as self-inflicted. Much of this attitude benights the current debate about benefits. However, it was the underlying sentiments of those who took offence at what I said that most intrigued me for there was a hidden belief that I had no right to say what I said and should have stayed quiet. It seemed odd that those who seemed to be suggesting that I was somehow being unpatriotic and un-British in what I said should be so un-British in wanting to deny me a basic right of our democracy-the freedom of speech.

Much of this latent sense was encapsulated by suggestions that the Church had no part in politics. So, a recent correspondent to the Grantham Journal wrote this… Dr Ellis and his ilk only weaken the belief in Christianity by speaking out about things they know very little about. We must remember he is a theologian not a politician. To balance this, a letter in The Independent on 13 May said this…I would be happy if they (the bishops) became genuinely political and truly vociferous over issues such as war, poverty, injustice and child abuse. As it is, when challenged to speak out on such things all to often the excuse is “we must not be too political”.

Your’re damned if you do and you’re damned if you don’t!

One would have hoped that this hoary old chestnut would have been well and truly put to bed by now, but perhaps there is still a need to assert that it is an absolute imperative that bishops and the Church-nay all people of faith and conviction-speak out about the economics, social trends, policies and manifestos which affect our well-being at the most fundamental level. For politics is the science of the people, and we are all people. For the Churchman there is strong support and precedent for this. Jesus, to my knowledge, only ever read directly from the Jewish Bible once, and he chose this passage:The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free. It strikes me as being a highly political statement. Further, the very death of Jesus seems to have been precipitated by him coming into conflict with those who held political power in his day and who saw him as a political threat. Move on a few centuries, and we have the Roman Emperor Constantine declaring Christianity the State religion, putting it at the very heart of the Empire’s political life to such an extent that that the seats of temporal power, the basilicas, became Christian churches. On through history, and we must ask ourselves the question as to whether slavery would have been abolished if churchmen like Wilberforce had not stood out against the vested political interest of the day or whether equality for black people in America would ever have been achieved if it hadn’t been for the sacrifice of churchmen like Martin Luther King? And what about those bishops in the House of Lords, the very heartland of British political life: are they only to spout platitudes or are they to set their theological understandings about life and truth to critique the morality and ethics of political policies? And,  isn’t it true that the government of the 1980s initiated its ethos by quoting the Christian Saint Francis: Where there is discord, may we bring harmony. Where there is error, may we bring truth. Where there is doubt, may we bring faith. And where there is despair, may we bring hope.”

No, it is vital that people of faith join in the condemnation of the injustices, division, hatred and social fracture that political policies often cause and it is particularly important that the bishops do this, to do less would be a deep betrayal of faith. So, the question remains: ‘do you want us to speak out about the oppressive regime in Zimbabwe, the effects of racist politicians on our own streets or the erosion of the NHS, or would you rather we stayed silent and read our Bibles quietly and inoffensively to ourselves?’



~ by Tim Ellis on May 14, 2013.

8 Responses to “The Body Politic”

  1. Right on the button. Христос воскрес!

  2. This is well said. We do indeed live in “sealed bubbles” which effectively own the media. Most people find it hard to realise what goes on outside the sealed bubble. It is so important that those who are sealed out can raise their voice – through their religious leaders if all other media fails. It may be that some (or even most) constituencies may be better off because of Maggie’s reforms, but I’m not sure those ends ever justified the means. I fear we may be in a repeat cycle with scapegoating shifting rapidly from bankers to the poorest – unable to help themselves. Of course, we should speak of such matters.

  3. Well done Tim, no one said ministry was going to be easy and I for one admire you for taking a stand for kingdom values. Few do today. You know, the very statement that lies at the heart of our faith ie ‘Jesus is Lord’, is a political statement because it means the Caesars of our day and our world aren’t.

    Your blogs are refreshing and insightful. Keep up the great work and don’t let the buggers get you down.

  4. The passage about motes and beams is apposite. No problem with the church criticising politicians and commenting on political issues, but the church needs to consider its own failings.

  5. I thank God that are bishops like Tim who are prepared to stick their heads over the parapet and risk getting them shot off because the command to ‘love your nieghbour’ burns in their hearts. I minister in one of the most deprived parishes in the country and I am not scared to speak out about social injustice or to encourage folks here to find in the Gospel the power to transform thier lives. I was fortunate enough to be one of Tim’s priests for a couple of years, and found him a man of deep integrity. I am sad to learn that he’s resigning because I found him deeply caring and supportive of his clergy.

    Yes, the church needs to consider it’s own failings, yet we are also called to proclaim the gospel afresh in every generation. And part of that is not only to call individuals to repentance but also political systems and governments. In light of this, one of our greatest failings is not to speak out more when governments and political systems disempower people, oppress them and disproportionally and selfishly increase the wealth of the few at the expense of the poor.

  6. Hi we would like a vicar minister to open this event ?

    Children Screaming To Be Be Heard The Silent Witness Conference (Gathering The Truth)

    The Olde Barn Hotel
    Toll Bar Road, Marston, NG32 2HT Grantham
    Wednesday 4th of september 9 am to 6 pm.

    To who Ever Cares about Children and Their families.

    We would Like to Offer You a free place at this Event Places are limited.

    Please email should you wish to be a guest speaker and you can offer the conference either A class action Advice Child Protection advice Or Human Rights Advice.
    We welcome social workers foster carers their agencies solicitors and the general public.

    The Child Protection Conference This Year We are concentrating on The Evidence & The Professionals Role In Safe Guarding Children And Helping Parents/Grandparents To Keep Their Children.

    Confirmed Guest Speakers FLORENCE BELLONE JOHN HEMMINGS Maggie Tuttle Grandmother
    Sarah Goodley Paul Manning Christina England many to confirm.

    Grandparents/Parents Very Welcome and the public we have space only for 300 so please say you are going only if you are.


    We Need You Parents/Grandparents Who have Lost Their Children/Grandchildren To The Care System to bring your evidence as we will have top solicitors and barristers we need at least 100 people with evidence to lodge a class action.

    Professionals Needed such as Midwifes Social Workers Firemen Police Nhs Whistle-blowers Doctors Teachers Solicitors Care Workers HealthVisitors NSPCC VICARS THE PUBLIC YOU ALL CAN CHANGE THE LIVES OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES BY ATTENDING AND MAKING A CHANGE.

    Children Screaming To Be Be Heard The Silent Witness here lies the truth a registered charity so children can have a voice. Please sign this petition for a monument erected for

    a) Died as a result of failures by the authorities or care system.

    b) Died Abused as a result of failures by the authorities or care system.

    c) Died Abused by the care system.

    Join Us on Facebook

    Please Donate to help Adopted Children
    Find Their Parents And Families Reunite.

  7. Tim I watched your interview by the BBC. The late Margaret Thatcher was known and still is as the “milk snatcher”. I hope you and the family are settled and are prospering in whatever role you have now taken. Not worshipped for 25 years might just start now . Thanks.

    • Hi Ian. I’ve not visited the site recently-settling down to the new life.But good to hear from you. May start blogging again as a result of your e-mail. Best wsihes.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: